Well: Think Like a Doctor: A Confused and Terrified Patient

The Challenge: Can you solve the mystery of a middle-aged man recovering from a serious illness who suddenly becomes frightened and confused?

Every month the Diagnosis column of The New York Times Magazine asks Well readers to sift through a difficult case and solve a diagnostic riddle. Below you will find a summary of a case involving a 55-year-old man well on his way to recovering from a series of illnesses when he suddenly becomes confused and paranoid. I will provide you with the main medical notes, labs and imaging results available to the doctor who made the diagnosis.

The first reader to figure out this case will get a signed copy of my book, “Every Patient Tells a Story,” along with the satisfaction of knowing you solved a case of Sherlockian complexity. Good luck.

The Presenting Problem:

A 55-year-old man who is recovering from a devastating injury in a rehabilitation facility suddenly becomes confused, frightened and paranoid.

The Patient’s Story:

The patient, who was recovering from a terrible injury and was too weak to walk, had been found on the floor of his room at the extended care facility, raving that there were people out to get him. He was taken to the emergency room at the Waterbury Hospital in Connecticut, where he was diagnosed with a urinary tract infection and admitted to the hospital for treatment. Doctors thought his delirium was caused by the infection, but after 24 hours, despite receiving the appropriate antibiotics, the patient remained disoriented and frightened.

A Sister’s Visit:

The man’s sister came to visit him on his second day in the hospital. As she walked into the room she was immediately struck by her brother’s distress.

“Get me out of here!” the man shouted from his hospital bed. “They are coming to get me. I gotta get out of here!”

His brown eyes darted from side to side as if searching for his would-be attackers. His arms and legs shook with fear. He looked terrified.

For the past few months, the man had been in and out of the hospital, but he had been getting better — at least he had been improving the last time his sister saw him, the week before. She hurried into the bustling hallway and found a nurse. “What the hell is going on with my brother?” she demanded.

A Long Series of Illnesses:

Three months earlier, the patient had been admitted to that same hospital with delirium tremens. After years of alcohol abuse, he had suddenly stopped drinking a couple of days before, and his body was wracked by the sudden loss of the chemical he had become addicted to. He’d spent an entire week in the hospital but finally recovered. He was sent home, but he didn’t stay there for long.

The following week, when his sister hadn’t heard from him for a couple of days, she forced her way into his home. There she found him, unconscious, in the basement, at the bottom of his staircase. He had fallen, and it looked as if he may have been there for two, possibly three, days. He was close to death. Indeed, in the ambulance on the way to the hospital, his heart had stopped. Rapid action by the E.M.T.’s brought his heart back to life, and he made it to the hospital.

There the extent of the damage became clear. The man’s kidneys had stopped working, and his body chemistry was completely out of whack. He had a severe concussion. And he’d had a heart attack.

He remained in the intensive care unit for nearly three weeks, and in the hospital another two weeks. Even after these weeks of care and recovery, the toll of his injury was terrible. His kidneys were not working, so he required dialysis three times a week. He had needed a machine to help him breathe for so long that he now had to get oxygen through a hole that had been cut into his throat. His arms and legs were so weak that he could not even lift them, and because he was unable even to swallow, he had to be fed through a tube that went directly into his stomach.

Finally, after five weeks in the hospital, he was well enough to be moved to a short-term rehabilitation hospital to complete the long road to recovery. But he was still far from healthy. The laughing, swaggering, Harley-riding man his sister had known until that terrible fall seemed a distant memory, though she saw that he was slowly getting better. He had even started to smile and make jokes. He was confident, he had told her, that with a lot of hard work he could get back to normal. So was she; she knew he was tough.

Back to the Hospital:

The patient had been at the rehab facility for just over two weeks when the staff noticed a sudden change in him. He had stopped smiling and was no longer making jokes. Instead, he talked about people that no one else could see. And he was worried that they wanted to harm him. When he remained confused for a second day, they sent him to the emergency room.

You can see the records from that E.R. visit here.

The man told the E.R. doctor that he knew he was having hallucinations. He thought they had started when he had begun taking a pill to help him sleep a couple of days earlier. It seemed a reasonable explanation, since the medication was known to cause delirium in some people. The hospital psychiatrist took him off that medication and sent him back to rehab that evening with a different sleeping pill.

Back to the Hospital, Again:

Two days later, the patient was back in the emergency room. He was still seeing things that weren’t there, but now he was quite confused as well. He knew his name but couldn’t remember what day or month it was, or even what year. And he had no idea where he was, or where he had just come from.

When the medical team saw the patient after he had been admitted, he was unable to provide any useful medical history. His medical records outlined his earlier hospitalizations, and records from the nursing home filled in additional details. The patient had a history of high blood pressure, depression and alcoholism. He was on a long list of medications. And he had been confused for the past several days.

On examination, he had no fever, although a couple of hours earlier his temperature had been 100.0 degrees. His heart was racing, and his blood pressure was sky high. His arms and legs were weak and swollen. His legs were shaking, and his reflexes were very brisk. Indeed, when his ankle was flexed suddenly, it continued to jerk back and forth on its own three or four times before stopping, a phenomenon known as clonus.

His labs were unchanged from the previous visit except for his urine, which showed signs of a serious infection. A CT scan of the brain was unremarkable, as was a chest X-ray. He was started on an intravenous antibiotic to treat the infection. The thinking was that perhaps the infection was causing the patient’s confusion.

You can see the notes from that second hospital visit here.

His sister had come to visit him the next day, when he was as confused as he had ever been. He was now trembling all over and looked scared to death, terrified. He was certain he was being pursued.

That is when she confronted the nurse, demanding to know what was going on with her brother. The nurse didn’t know. No one did. His urinary tract infection was being treated with antibiotics, but he continued to have a rapid heart rate and elevated blood pressure, along with terrifying hallucinations.

Solving the Mystery:

Can you figure out why this man was so confused and tremulous? I have provided you with all the data available to the doctor who made the diagnosis. The case is not easy — that is why it is here. I’ll post the answer on Friday.

Friday Feb. 8 4:13 p.m. | Updated Thanks for all your responses. You can read about the winner at “Think Like a Doctor: A Confused and Terrified Patient Solved.”


Rules and Regulations: Post your questions and diagnosis in the comments section below.. The correct answer will appear Friday on Well. The winner will be contacted. Reader comments may also appear in a coming issue of The New York Times Magazine.

Correction: The patient’s eyes were brown, not blue.

Read More..

HealthCare Partners seeks license to operate as managed-care plan









HealthCare Partners, the medical-group giant acquired last year by dialysis chain DaVita Inc. for $4.4 billion, is seeking a state license to operate as a managed-care plan after questions were raised about its compliance with California law.


The California Department of Managed Health Care has been looking into the nation's largest operator of physician groups since last fall when a patient sued the Torrance company and accused it of acting like a health plan without the necessary Knox-Keene Act license. A spokeswoman for the managed-care agency said the allegations against HealthCare Partners "are still under review."


The case is part of a wider debate about whether regulatory oversight is keeping pace with consolidation among doctors, hospitals and insurers and changes in medical payment sparked by the federal healthcare law. A state healthcare board is expected to discuss these matters Monday in Sacramento.





HealthCare Partners, which runs large medical groups in Southern California and four other states, had $2.4 billion in revenue in 2011 and serves about 750,000 patients, including more than 190,000 in Medicare Advantage plans. The combined company, called DaVita HealthCare Partners, is based in Denver.


William Chin, executive medical director at HealthCare Partners, said the company is in full compliance with current law and its application for a limited health plan license is unrelated to the recent complaint.


Chin said the state license hasn't been necessary before because the company contracted with licensed health plans to care for their patients, but new initiatives with Medicare require a different arrangement.


"We are in violation of no statute or law," Chin said. The state "has reviewed these relationships and contracts for decades."


State regulators require insurers and other "risk-bearing organizations" to hold adequate reserves to pay medical bills and to comply with patient protections.


California Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg (D-Sacramento) asked officials to address these concerns about licensing in November, records show.


In December, Brent Barnhart, director of the Department of Managed Health Care, responded in a letter that the agency "has been actively engaged in discussions with HealthCare Partners regarding its business model."


Steinberg also asked whether the state had a conflict of interest because a HealthCare Partners executive and physician, Keith Wilson, serves as chairman of the agency's Financial Standards Solvency Board. The board advises the agency on certain rules for health plans and medical providers.


"Dr. Wilson's hand in advising the regulation of accountable-care organizations could be viewed as a contributing factor to a biased investigation," Steinberg wrote in his Nov. 20 letter.


The board is scheduled to discuss this potential conflict of interest at its meeting Monday. Barnhart told Steinberg that he plans to "reconfigure the makeup of the board to include additional consumer representation" later this year.


A spokesman for Steinberg said the lawmaker is awaiting more information from the healthcare agency before commenting further.


The senator's concerns stemmed from a lawsuit filed in September by Healthcare Partners patient Juan Carlos Jandres in Los Angeles County Superior Court. The suit alleges that the company engaged in unfair and fraudulent business practices. An additional plaintiff and former HealthCare Partners employee, Corey Hambrick, joined the suit last month.


Jandres sought care in 2010 for a growth in his mouth, according to his suit. He contends HealthCare Partners denied him access to appropriate hospital care because it was trying to avoid hospital claims it was responsible for paying. As a result, according to the suit, Jandres lost most of his jaw to cancer. Chin said the allegations of poor patient care are untrue.


chad.terhune@latimes.com





Read More..

Ex-cop called 'depraved,' 'cowardly'









Authorities confirmed Thursday that a door-to-door search for an ex-L.A. police officer wanted in connection with a string of shootings was underway in Big Bear after his vehicle was found burning on a forest road.

San Bernardino Sheriff John McMahon said officials matched the VIN number on the burnt truck to that of suspect Christopher Jordan Dorner, 33, the subject of an intensive hours-long manhunt that stretched across Southern California.






Big Bear Lake Fire Department Asst. Chief Mark Mills told The Times that fresh tracks spotted in the snow were believed to be Dorner's.

McMahon declined to reveal details about what was inside the truck or how it caught fire but said authorities had confirmed Dorner was not inside. He did not discuss which direction Dorner might have traveled.

Authorities were going door-to-door in the mountain community that includes a total of about 400 homes, of which authorities guessed only about 40% were occupied year-round. Extra patrols were brought in to check vehicles coming and going from Big Bear, McMahon said, but no vehicles had been reported stolen.
"He could be anywhere at this point," McMahon said. When asked if the burnt truck was a possible diversion, McMahon replied: "Anything's possible."

Dorner had no known connection to the area, authorities said.

Television footage showed a fatigue-clad SWAT team combing the woods, rifles pointed, and the truck being towed away. Federal authorities later ordered media helicopters away from the area.

McMahon called Thursday a "sad and tragic day for all of us in law enforcement."

Several law enforcement agencies are involved in the manhunt for Dorner and alerts have been issued all across California and in Nevada. The Los Angeles Police Department had dispatched units across the region to protect at least 40 officers and others named in a rambling online manifesto that law enforcement officials attributed to Dorner.

Dorner, who was fired from the LAPD in 2009, is suspected of shooting three police officers, one of whom died, in Riverside County early Thursday.

Dorner also is suspected of killing a couple in Orange County earlier this week who were found shot in a car. One of the victims was the daughter of a former LAPD captain named in the purported manifesto.

Dorner was believed to be carrying multiple weapons, including an assault rifle.

Law enforcement authorities said they were concerned about Dorner's military background and weapons training. The lengthy online message allegedly written by the former Navy Reserve lieutenant threatened "unconventional and asymmetrical warfare" against police.

Dorner received awards for his expertise with a rifle and pistol, according to military records obtained by The Times. He received an Iraq Campaign Medal and was a member of a mobile inshore undersea warfare unit.
Riverside Police Chief Sergio Diaz, calling the attack a "cowardly ambush," said Dorner is suspected of opening fire with a rifle about 1:30 a.m. Thursday as he pulled up to two police officers waiting at a traffic light.

The attack was carried out about 20 minutes after Dorner wounded an LAPD officer in a shooting in nearby Corona, police said.
Early Thursday, two women delivering newspapers in Torrance were shot by Los Angeles police who were guarding an officer named in the manifesto.

The women, shot in the 19500 block of Redbeam Avenue, were taken to area hospitals, Torrance Police Lt. Devin Chase said. One suffered a minor wound, and the other was struck twice and listed in stable condition, LAPD Chief Charlie Beck told reporters.

"Tragically," Beck said, "we believe this is a case of mistaken identity."



Read More..

Bieber's mom trying to stay out of abortion debate


NEW YORK (AP) — Justin Bieber's mom wants to set the record straight: She's not interested in the political fray on abortion as she promotes "Crescendo," a new film she hopes will raise $10 million for centers that help pregnant girls.


Pattie Mallette, an unmarried teen herself when she had Bieber, signed on as an executive producer after the film was finished. She said Thursday that she connected personally with the story about a suicide and abortion attempt by Beethoven's mother.


"The press has been saying that I'm producing an anti-abortion film and taking this big stance. You know, I haven't shared my stance with anyone and I'm not here to make a political statement, so there's been a lot of assumptions made."


Mallette, in numerous interviews and her autobiography, "Nowhere but Up," has recounted her own suicide attempt, pressure to have an abortion when she became pregnant at 18 and struggles with drugs and alcohol before becoming a Christian.


The movie does include some producers who have anti-abortion beliefs, she said, but her goal is simple: to support residential programs like the one that helped her after her parents kicked her out of the house in Canada.


"The pregnancy center that I lived in is now closed because of lack of funds, so I thought it was a really important thing that they're doing to raise money," Mallette said.


The movie will be released Feb. 28 worldwide.


Mallette has had her share of mom moments of late with her only child, who at 18 is the youngest singer to have five chart-topping albums and will be both host and musical guest for the Feb. 9 episode of "Saturday Night Live" on NBC.


Like his Instagram photo (since deleted) of his butt crack. What ran through her head?


"I thought, I'm a mom, I don't want to see that," Mallette sighed, shaking her head. "I don't want to see him doing that kind of stuff. But, you know, he's 18. He's making some of his own decisions and he's going to make some mistakes and he's going to make some good choices, too."


What of reports of pot smoking and partying with "sizzurp"-downing hip hop singers — sizzurp being a purplish mixture of cough syrup with codeine and promethazine, a carbonated soft drink and pieces of Jolly Rancher candy.


"It's hard, you know, as a mom of an 18-year-old because that's the time when you just gotta start letting go," she said. "And, you know, I had to make some of my own mistakes. I gotta kind of let go and let him make some of his own mistakes and just hope that I put all the right things in him."


And what of Bieber's relationship with Selena Gomez?


"I have no idea if they're on-again, off-again," she said. "It's a constant thing. Today I'm not sure where they stand. I try to stay out of it. He's 18. He doesn't want me getting involved in his romantic life."


___


Follow Leanne Italie on Twitter at http://twitter.com/litalie


Read More..

Well: The 'Monday Morning' Medical Screaming Match

I did not think I would ever see another “morbidity and mortality” conference in which senior doctors publicly attacked their younger colleagues for making medical errors. These types of heated meetings were commonplace when I was a medical student but have largely been abandoned.

Yet here they were again on “Monday Mornings,” a new medical drama on the TNT network, based on a novel by Dr. Sanjay Gupta, CNN’s chief medical correspondent and one of the executive producers of the show. Such screaming matches may make for good television, but it is useful to review why new strategies have emerged for dealing with medical mistakes.

So-called M&M conferences emerged in the early 20th century as a way for physicians to review cases that had either surprising outcomes or had somehow gone wrong. Although the format varied among institutions and departments, surgery M&Ms were especially known for their confrontations, as more experienced surgeons often browbeat younger doctors into admitting their errors and promising to never make them again.

Such conferences were generally closed door — that is, attended only by physicians. Errors were a private matter not to be shared with other hospital staff, let alone patients and families.

But in the late 1970s, a sociology graduate student named Charles L. Bosk gained access to the surgery department at the University of Chicago. His resultant 1979 book, “Forgive and Remember,” was one of the earliest public discussions of how the medical profession addressed its mistakes.

Dr. Bosk developed a helpful terminology. Technical and judgment errors by surgeons could be forgiven, but only if they were remembered and subsequently prevented by those who committed them. Normative errors, which called into question the moral character of the culprit, were unacceptable and potentially jeopardized careers.

Although Dr. Bosk’s book was more observational than proscriptive, his depiction of M&M conferences was disturbing. I remember attending a urology M&M as a medical student in which several senior physicians berated a very well-meaning and competent intern for a perceived mistake. The intern seemed to take it very well, but my fellow students and I were shaken by the event, asking how such hostility could be conducive to learning.

There were lots of angry accusations in the surgical M&Ms in the pilot episode of “Monday Mornings.” In one case, a senior doctor excoriated a colleague who had given Tylenol to a woman with hip pain who turned out to have cancer. “You allowed metastatic cancer to run amok for four months!” he screamed.

If this was what Dr. Bosk would have called a judgment error, the next case raised moral issues. A neurosurgeon had operated on a boy’s brain tumor without doing a complete family history, which would have revealed a disorder of blood clotting. The boy bled to death on the operating table. “The boy died,” announced the head surgeon, “because of a doctor’s arrogance.”

In one respect, it is good to see that the doctors in charge were so concerned. But as the study of medical errors expanded in the 1990s, researchers found that the likelihood of being blamed led physicians to conceal their errors. Meanwhile, although doctors who attended such conferences might indeed not make the exact same mistakes that had been discussed, it was far from clear that M&Ms were the best way to address the larger problem of medical errors, which, according to a 1999 study, killed close to 100,000 Americans annually.

Eventually, experts recommended a “systems approach” to medical errors, similar to what had been developed by the airline industry. The idea was to look at the root causes of errors and to devise systems to prevent them. Was there a way, for example, to ensure that the woman with the hip problem would return to medical care when the Tylenol did not help? Or could operations not be allowed to occur until a complete family history was in the chart? Increasingly, hospitals have put in systems, such as preoperative checklists and computer warnings, that successfully prevent medical errors.

Another key component of the systems approach is to reduce the emphasis on blame. Even the best doctors make mistakes. Impugning them publicly — or even privately — can make them clam up. But if errors are seen as resulting from inadequate systems, physicians and other health professionals should be more willing to speak up.

Of course, the systems approach is not perfect. Studies continue to show that physicians conceal their mistakes. And elaborate systems for preventing errors can at times interfere with getting things done in the hospital.

Finally, it is important not to entirely remove the issue of responsibility. Sad to say, there still are physicians who are careless and others who are arrogant. Even if today’s M&M conferences rarely involve screaming, supervising physicians need to let such colleagues know that these types of behaviors are unacceptable.


Barron H. Lerner, M.D., professor of medicine at New York University Langone Medical Center, is the author, most recently, of “One for the Road: Drunk Driving Since 1900.”
Read More..

Hedge fund manager steps up attack on Herbalife









NEW YORK — It might be easy to make a movie about Bill Ackman, the handsome and confident Wall Street tycoon whose actions over the last two months have won him as many friends as they have enemies.


Whether he'd be the hero or the villain depends on whom you ask.


In his own eyes, Ackman is the righteous investor, protecting low-income people from the clutches of health food-and-supplement maker Herbalife Ltd. by betting $1 billion that the Los Angeles company will fail. To Herbalife, he's a nemesis making specious allegations about a company he knows little about, just to make a buck.





Ackman launched a second public-relations assault against Herbalife on Thursday, releasing more than 270 detailed questions and mocking Chief Executive Michael Johnson for comparing the company to the Girl Scouts.


Ackman's 40-page missive also questioned whether Herbalife was complying with a 1986 injunction won by the California attorney general's office that prohibits the company from paying commissions for recruiting. A spokeswoman for Atty. Gen. Kamala Harris declined to say whether her office was investigating the matter.


Wall Street seemed to shrug Thursday; Herbalife's stock rose 13 cents, or about 0.4%, to $35.92. The muted stock movement comes the same day Ackman was to face his own investors at his hedge fund Pershing Square Capital Management's annual dinner in New York.


Either way, Ackman's assault highlights the cutthroat brawls of high finance and thrusts into the spotlight discussions that might otherwise take place behind the closed doors at his marble-and-glass office suite overlooking Central Park. Rather than investing in Herbalife to improve the company, Ackman "shorted," or bet against the stock, and is very publicly trying to help bring the company down.


"I believe it's good for America for this company to disappear," Ackman said in an interview.


He's part of a new breed of activist investors who make public their doubts about a company and put money on the idea that such attention will help topple the company. It's an aggressive tactic, but in the world after the financial crisis, many investors argue that a little skepticism about business is a good thing.


"This idea of people publicly raising issues at companies and short-selling them is really something that we've seen come into the public only really since the financial crisis," said Ron Orol, author of "Extreme Value Hedging: How Activist Hedge Fund Managers Are Taking On the World." "The financial crisis exposed a lot of problems at companies, and so some activists build on that information and publicly try to explain their case."


Because they profit on companies' declining fortunes, short sellers do not always have the rosiest of reputations. But Ackman sees greater need for short sellers on Wall Street.


"If you knew [Bernard] Madoff was a fraud, and you had done 18 months' worth of work and you knew it for a certainty, and you just kept your mouth shut … I think you have a moral obligation," he said. "A whistle-blower-slash-short-seller is a healthy thing for the market and a good thing for the world."


Other money managers disclosed positions on either side of Ackman's bet. Among them are Dan Loeb, founder of the hedge fund Third Point, who sided with Icahn, and Whitney Tilson, co-founder of T2 Partners, who also reportedly shorted Herbalife.


Ackman's crusade against Herbalife seems uniquely passionate and has inspired an equally personal response. Corporate raider Carl Icahn recently slammed Ackman on live TV in what money manager John Hempton went so far as to call "hedge fund porn."


At a recent dinner of 15 or so hedge fund investors, discussion turned to the odd nature of the battle between Icahn and Ackman, said Wilbur Ross, the billionaire best known for buying out steel and coal companies.


"I'm a bit surprised that this is happening," Ross said. "Carl has a good track record. Loeb has a good track record. Ackman has a good track record. At the end of the day, Wall Street people will be interested in who got what and how."


Ackman casts his campaign as a matter of conviction, saying he has plenty of other investment opportunities.


"Why do I feel a moral obligation here?" he said in the interview. "The answer is: Because this company is harming millions of people, and it's done it for 32 years, and the list of heart-[wrenching], disastrous life stories of the people that this company has wrecked is incredible."


Herbalife has angrily fought back against Ackman's claims.


In a statement Thursday, the company said: "Herbalife is a financially strong and successful global nutrition company, having created meaningful value for shareholders, significant opportunities for distributors and positively impacted the lives and health of consumers since our founding in 1980. Pershing Square's latest tome is motivated by a reckless $1-billion short bet."





Read More..

Obama names REI chief to lead the Interior Department

President Obama nominated REI business executive Sally Jewell to lead his second-term Interior Department.









WASHINGTON – President Obama on Wednesday nominated Sally Jewell, a former oil engineer and banker and current chief executive of a national outdoor retailer, to lead the Interior Department, making an unorthodox pick for his first woman nominee to his second-term Cabinet.


The president and CEO of Recreational Equipment Inc., Jewell has no government and little public policy experience, and has spent her career far from Washington. But her resume has elements that appealed to both of the two feuding interests that consume much of the debate at the department that controls public lands: the oil and gas extraction industries seeking access to public lands, as well as environmentalists seeking to preserve them.


Jewell, 56, started her career as a petroleum engineer working in the oil fields of Oklahoma and Colorado for Mobil Oil Corp. She then moved to the corporate banking industry, and joined the REI board in 1996,  becoming chief operating officer four years later.








PHOTOS: President Obama’s past


She has been credited with expanding the Washington state-based retailer's Internet operations and contributing the membership cooperative’s resources to environmental stewardship. Jewell, an avid outdoorswoman, serves on the board of the National Parks Conservation Assn. as well as the Board of Regents of the University of Washington.


In announcing his choice, Obama cast her as someone who would seek a balance between protection and economic development of public lands. 


“She knows the link between conservation and good jobs,” Obama said in remarks at the White House. “She knows that there’s no contradiction between being good stewards of the land and our economic progress, that in fact, those two things need to go hand-in-hand. She’s shown that a company with more than $1 billion in sales can do the right thing for our planet.”


In fact, little is known about Jewell’s policy positions. And while environmental groups largely praised her nomination, Republicans and some Democrats withheld judgment.


“The livelihoods of Americans living and working in the West rely on maintaining a real balance between conservation and economic opportunity,” said Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), the ranking member of the Senate committee on energy and national resources.  “I look forward to hearing about the qualifications Ms. Jewell has that make her a suitable candidate to run such an important agency, and how she plans to restore balance to the Interior Department.”


PHOTOS: President Obama’s second inauguration


If confirmed, Jewell will replace Ken Salazar, who served in the post throughout the president’s first term and led a period of expansion of oil and gas drilling on public lands. Salazar plans to return to Colorado. Obama on Wednesday praised the former senator as a close friend and trusted advisor.


Salazar, he said, had “ushered in a new era of conservation of our land, our water and our wildlife.”


“He’s opened more public land and water for safe and responsible energy production – not just gas and oil, but also wind and solar – creating thousands of new jobs and nearly doubling our use of renewable energy in this country,” Obama said. 


Jewell is the first woman to be named to lead a Cabinet-level department in the second term. After naming a few white men to top jobs, Obama said the next round of nominees would include more women and be more racially diverse.


Follow Politics Now on Twitter and Facebook


Kathleen.hennessey@latimes.com


Twitter: @khennessey





Read More..

Chris Brown returns to court for probation issues


LOS ANGELES (AP) — With the woman he assaulted throwing him a kiss, Chris Brown walked into court Wednesday to face allegations he failed to complete his community labor sentence for Rihanna's 2009 beating.


A judge asked for more information and scheduled another hearing in two months.


Rihanna, the glamorous singer whose bruised face became a tabloid fixture after she was beaten by her then-boyfriend on the way to the Grammys, has been dating Brown again.


She arrived with the R&B star, his mother and two other women and blew him a kiss as he entered the courtroom. They left together after the short proceeding in which Superior Court Judge James Brandlin set the next hearing for April 5.


Brown's lawyer, Mark Geragos, said he was disturbed about the way the district attorney handled the matter and said he would be filing a motion opposing the prosecution's move to modify Brown's fulfillment of his community labor sentence.


He offered details of Brown's various community labor stints cleaning stables,


Prosecutors, who said they could find no credible evidence that Brown had completed his community labor in his home state of Virginia, asked that he start all over and put in 180 days in Los Angeles County.


Prosecutors have suggested there was either sloppy record keeping or fraudulent reporting.


Later in the day, Geragos filed an angry response, alleging that prosecutors submitted material to the court that was "DEAD WRONG" and asking they be sanctioned.


He offered details of Brown's various community labor stints clearing brush at stables, shredding documents, painting walls and picking up trash.


In a news conference Geragos said, "I've never had a client, and I've represented a wide breadth and thousands of clients, never ever had a client who has been tortured by a DA's office on probation like Chris Brown has."


He said Rihanna was present in support because, "She thinks it's utterly ridiculous what they're doing to him, as do I."


He said prosecutions launched a "vicious and unwarranted attack on Mr. Brown" and officials in Richmond, Va., who oversaw his community labor program.


He submitted a letter from a Richmond Police Department official disputing the prosecution's claims of shoddy record keeping and inadequate supervision in Brown's home state where he was allowed to fulfill the requirements.


The judge noted during the brief court session that a prosecution filing did not request revocation of Brown's probation and he, therefore, would not revoke it.


The prosecution motion filed Tuesday also raised for the first time in Brown's felony assault case several incidents that prosecutors said demonstrate Brown has ongoing anger management issues.


The motion cited a Jan. 27 fight between Brown and fellow R&B star Frank Ocean, and a 2011 outburst in which Brown threw a chair through a window after he was asked about the Rihanna attack on "Good Morning America."


The filing represents a dramatic shift in the case against Brown, who was repeatedly praised by another judge overseeing his case for his completion of domestic violence courses and his community service work in his home state of Virginia.


That changed in September, when prosecutors raised concerns about Brown's community service after he logged 701 hours in seven months — an amount that had previously taken him more than two years to achieve.


Los Angeles investigators traveled to Richmond, Va., to investigate Brown's service.


"This inquiry provided no credible, competent or verifiable evidence that defendant Brown performed his community labor as presented to this court," Deputy District Attorney Mary Murray wrote.


Brown's attorney Geragos blasted the court filing, saying the prosecutor ignored interviews "where sworn peace officers stated unequivocally that Mr. Brown was supervised and did all of the community service."


Brown's case was transferred to Brandlin after a recent shuffling of judicial assignments.


After pleading guilty to the Rihanna attack, Brown was given permission to serve 180 days of community labor in Virginia, but only as long as he performed manual labor such as graffiti removal and roadside cleanup.


Given problems with documentation and statements from some witnesses who contradict Brown's claims of work, prosecutors asked Brandlin to order Brown to repeat his service in Los Angeles.


Brown spent one-third of the hours he logged in Virginia working night shifts at a day care center in rural Virginia where his mother once served as director and where the singer spent time as a child.


A detective who checked on Brown's work nine times at the Tappahannock Children's Center found the singer, his mother and a bodyguard at the center on each visit.


The records said Brown waxed floors or performed general cleaning at the center.


A professional floor cleaner contracted to work at the daycare center told investigators he had been cleaning the floors during the months Brown reported working at the facility.


"Claims that the defendant cleaned, stripped and waxed floors at that location have been credibly contradicted," prosecutors said in the filing.


Brown's mother, Joyce Hawkins, no longer had a formal role at the day care center but had her own set of keys and coordinated her son's work at the facility, prosecutors said.


Murray stated in her filing that the police report on Brown's service was "at best sloppy documentation and at worst fraudulent reporting."


No one from Virginia's probation department oversaw Brown's hours, prosecutors said.


The motion noted that the only records the department has to indicate Brown was supervised were officers' overtime sheets. Five of 21 days that officers logged overtime for Brown were spent providing security for the singer's concerts.


The allegations are the latest pre-Grammy controversy for Brown, who was arrested shortly after the 2009 ceremony for his attack on Rihanna. He has since returned to the awards show by performing and winning an award in 2011 for his album "F.A.M.E."


Brown and Ocean are competing against one other for the Best Urban Contemporary Album category at Sunday's Grammys.


___


AP writers Anthony McCartney and Ryan Pearson contributed to this report.


Read More..

Personal Health: Effective Addiction Treatment

Countless people addicted to drugs, alcohol or both have managed to get clean and stay clean with the help of organizations like Alcoholics Anonymous or the thousands of residential and outpatient clinics devoted to treating addiction.

But if you have failed one or more times to achieve lasting sobriety after rehab, perhaps after spending tens of thousands of dollars, you’re not alone. And chances are, it’s not your fault.

Of the 23.5 million teenagers and adults addicted to alcohol or drugs, only about 1 in 10 gets treatment, which too often fails to keep them drug-free. Many of these programs fail to use proven methods to deal with the factors that underlie addiction and set off relapse.

According to recent examinations of treatment programs, most are rooted in outdated methods rather than newer approaches shown in scientific studies to be more effective in helping people achieve and maintain addiction-free lives. People typically do more research when shopping for a new car than when seeking treatment for addiction.

A groundbreaking report published last year by the National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University concluded that “the vast majority of people in need of addiction treatment do not receive anything that approximates evidence-based care.” The report added, “Only a small fraction of individuals receive interventions or treatment consistent with scientific knowledge about what works.”

The Columbia report found that most addiction treatment providers are not medical professionals and are not equipped with the knowledge, skills or credentials needed to provide the full range of evidence-based services, including medication and psychosocial therapy. The authors suggested that such insufficient care could be considered “a form of medical malpractice.”

The failings of many treatment programs — and the comprehensive therapies that have been scientifically validated but remain vastly underused — are described in an eye-opening new book, “Inside Rehab,” by Anne M. Fletcher, a science writer whose previous books include the highly acclaimed “Sober for Good.”

“There are exceptions, but of the many thousands of treatment programs out there, most use exactly the same kind of treatment you would have received in 1950, not modern scientific approaches,” A. Thomas McLellan, co-founder of the Treatment Research Institute in Philadelphia, told Ms. Fletcher.

Ms. Fletcher’s book, replete with the experiences of treated addicts, offers myriad suggestions to help patients find addiction treatments with the highest probability of success.

Often, Ms. Fletcher found, low-cost, publicly funded clinics have better-qualified therapists and better outcomes than the high-end residential centers typically used by celebrities like Britney Spears and Lindsay Lohan. Indeed, their revolving-door experiences with treatment helped prompt Ms. Fletcher’s exhaustive exploration in the first place.

In an interview, Ms. Fletcher said she wanted to inform consumers “about science-based practices that should form the basis of addiction treatment” and explode some of the myths surrounding it.

One such myth is the belief that most addicts need to go to a rehab center.

“The truth is that most people recover (1) completely on their own, (2) by attending self-help groups, and/or (3) by seeing a counselor or therapist individually,” she wrote.

Contrary to the 30-day stint typical of inpatient rehab, “people with serious substance abuse disorders commonly require care for months or even years,” she wrote. “The short-term fix mentality partially explains why so many people go back to their old habits.”

Dr. Mark Willenbring, a former director of treatment and recovery research at the National Institute for Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, said in an interview, “You don’t treat a chronic illness for four weeks and then send the patient to a support group. People with a chronic form of addiction need multimodal treatment that is individualized and offered continuously or intermittently for as long as they need it.”

Dr. Willenbring now practices in St. Paul, where he is creating a clinic called Alltyr “to serve as a model to demonstrate what comprehensive 21st century treatment should look like.”

“While some people are helped by one intensive round of treatment, the majority of addicts continue to need services,” Dr. Willenbring said. He cited the case of a 43-year-old woman “who has been in and out of rehab 42 times” because she never got the full range of medical and support services she needed.

Dr. Willenbring is especially distressed about patients who are treated for opioid addiction, then relapse in part because they are not given maintenance therapy with the drug Suboxone.

“We have some pretty good drugs to help people with addiction problems, but doctors don’t know how to use them,” he said. “The 12-step community doesn’t want to use relapse-prevention medication because they view it as a crutch.”

Before committing to a treatment program, Ms. Fletcher urges prospective clients or their families to do their homework. The first step, she said, is to get an independent assessment of the need for treatment, as well as the kind of treatment needed, by an expert who is not affiliated with the program you are considering.

Check on the credentials of the program’s personnel, who should have “at least a master’s degree,” Ms. Fletcher said. If the therapist is a physician, he or she should be certified by the American Board of Addiction Medicine.

Does the facility’s approach to treatment fit with your beliefs and values? If a 12-step program like A.A. is not right for you, don’t choose it just because it’s the best known approach.

Meet with the therapist who will treat you and ask what your treatment plan will be. “It should be more than movies, lectures or three-hour classes three times a week,” Ms. Fletcher said. “You should be treated by a licensed addiction counselor who will see you one-on-one. Treatment should be individualized. One size does not fit all.”

Find out if you will receive therapy for any underlying condition, like depression, or a social problem that could sabotage recovery. The National Institute on Drug Abuse states in its Principles of Drug Addiction Treatment, “To be effective, treatment must address the individual’s drug abuse and any associated medical, psychological, social, vocational, and legal problems.”

Look for programs using research-validated techniques, like cognitive behavioral therapy, which helps addicts recognize what prompts them to use drugs or alcohol, and learn to redirect their thoughts and reactions away from the abused substance.

Other validated treatment methods include Community Reinforcement and Family Training, or Craft, an approach developed by Robert J. Meyers and described in his book, “Get Your Loved One Sober,” with co-author Brenda L. Wolfe. It helps addicts adopt a lifestyle more rewarding than one filled with drugs and alcohol.

This is the first of two articles on addiction treatment.

Read More..

Saturday mail delivery set to end in August









WASHINGTON — The U.S. Postal Service announced plans to end Saturday mail delivery starting in August while maintaining six-day delivery of packages, a move that faces an unclear future in Congress.


Postal officials said the action was crucial to keeping the agency solvent. It would be the biggest change in mail delivery since the post office ended twice-daily service in the 1950s.


Although the Postal Service no longer receives taxpayer funds, it remains subject to oversight by Congress, which since 1983 has repeatedly passed measures requiring six-day delivery. Postmaster General Patrick Donahoe's announcement appeared to be an effort to force action in Congress after comprehensive postal reform legislation stalled last year.





Postal officials say that as email has reduced the need for standard mail delivery and businesses have shifted to online billing and payment systems, they have been left with more workers and post offices than the volume of mail can support.


"Our financial condition is urgent," Donahoe said at a news conference, adding that ending letter deliveries on Saturdays would save $2 billion. "We need to operate with greater flexibility, so we can adapt quickly to the changing marketplace."


Americans "value the mail they receive, [but] they like to pay their bills online," Donahoe said.


Package delivery is not being curbed because the continued growth of online commerce has increased the agency's shipping business by 14% since 2010. That makes Saturday package delivery a potential moneymaker.


The postal service needs to find $20 billion in cost reductions and revenue increases to continue to operate, Donahoe said. Already, it has cut its workforce — one of the largest in the country — by 193,000 through attrition. It also has reduced costs by $15 billion by consolidating mail processing facilities, eliminating about 21,000 delivery routes and reducing hours at 9,000 postal facilities across the country.


"Even with these significant cost reductions, we still have a large budget gap to fill," Donahoe said.


The proposal announced Wednesday, which would take effect Aug. 5, aims to reduce the postal workforce by at least 20,000 more employees through reassignment and attrition. It would also significantly reduce overtime payments.


The announcement came with little advance notice to lawmakers, who were preparing to renew an effort to pass postal legislation this year.


Though many members of Congress insist they would have to approve the cutback, Donahoe told reporters that the agency believes it can move forward unilaterally. The current mandate for six-day delivery is part of a government funding measure that expires in late March.


"There's plenty of time in there so if there is some disagreement" with lawmakers, "we can get that resolved," he said.


The divide among lawmakers on the issue does not break cleanly along partisan lines. Lawmakers who represent rural areas, who tend to be Republicans, generally have opposed service cutbacks. So have those with strong backing from postal labor unions, mostly Democrats.


Last year, the Senate approved a bill that would have allowed the postal service to end Saturday delivery after a two-year period to evaluate the potential effects. Similar legislation in the House never came up for a vote.


The Obama administration had included a proposal for five-day mail delivery in its 2013 budget plan. White House officials, however, had said they supported that change only in concert with other reforms. White House spokesman Jay Carney said Wednesday that officials hadn't yet studied the latest plan.


Sen. Thomas R. Carper (D-Del.), the new chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, expressed concern that the Postal Service's unilateral announcement could complicate his plans for overall reform.


But, he added, "It's hard to condemn the postmaster general for moving aggressively to do what he believes he can and must do to keep the lights on."


Republican Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, a coauthor of the 2012 Senate bill, was more critical. She said that cutting service should "be the last resort, not the Postal Service's first choice," and said the announcement was "inconsistent with current law and threatens to further jeopardize its customer base."


Carper's counterpart in the House, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Vista), applauded the postal service announcement as a "common-sense reform" that should draw bipartisan support.


Rep. Adrian Smith (R-Neb.), co-chairman of the House Rural Caucus, called on Congress to find a solution that would "not disproportionately impact rural communities."


The American Postal Workers Union also condemned the move.


"USPS executives cannot save the Postal Service by tearing it apart," said union President Cliff Guffey. "These across-the-board cutbacks will weaken the nation's mail system and put it on a path to privatization."


michael.memoli@latimes.com





Read More..